Wednesday, March 10, 2021

Cesar Chavez: a conservative icon?

I recently wrote a blog post on illegal immigration's potential effect on rural America. Research suggests that rural Americans with high school degrees or less may financially benefit from greater border security. I conclude the post by positing that Americans concerned with reducing illegal immigration aren't always motivated by xenophobia.

So what does this have to do with Cesar Chavez? Well, Cesar Chavez represents one such individual who opposes illegal immigration on non-xenophobic grounds.


Mr. Chavez's views on illegal immigration, however, are less well known. One of Cesar Chavez's first acts as leader of the UFW was to protest the government's use of the "Bracero Program." The Bracero Program was a government program that granted temporary work visas to Mexican citizens to provide farm labor during harvesting season. Mr. Chavez saw the braceros as stealing the jobs of his union members, and once said: "[i]t looks almost impossible to start some effective program to get [my members] their jobs back from the braceros." Mr. Chavez and UFW were able to successfully pressure the U.S. Government to end the Bracero Program in 1964.

"[T]he illegal aliens are doubly exploited, first because they are farm workers, and second because they are powerless to defend their own interests," he wrote. "But if there were no illegals being used to break our strikes, we could win those strikes overnight and then be in a position to improve the living and working conditions of all farm workers."

Mr. Chavez spent his life fighting for legislative gains on behalf of his union members. He believed his legislative work was undercut by undocumented immigrants, whom employers could hire in the stead of Mexican-Americans to circumvent labor laws. Mr. Chavez also believed that undocumented immigrants undercut the efficacy of his labor strikes by providing employers with alternate labor sources.

In 1974, Mr. Chavez began his "Illegals Campaign" to deal with these issues by reducing the number of undocumented immigrants in the United States. This plan had two components: (1) UFW members would report any undocumented workers they uncovered to the INS, the government agency in charge of deportations; (2) hundreds of other UFW members would personally patrol the Rio Grande to stop undocumented immigrants from crossing, using violence on the immigrants if persuasion failed. Mr. Chavez essentially created his own paramilitary patrol group--of Mexican-Americans--to guard the border; an action that only far-right conservative groups in contemporary America would make.

I don't bring this up to suggest Cesar Chavez deserves to be cancelled. His reasons for opposing illegal immigration aren't hateful or racist; he seems to hold these views because he believes reducing illegal immigration will benefit his union members. 

The modern conservative viewpoint on illegal immigration is inseparable from Cesar Chavez's beliefs on the matter. Given the racist taint that President Trump gave to all conservative stances on immigration issues, it would behoove Republicans to make Cesar Chavez their immigration icon. This could help center the illegal immigration debate as an economic issue rather than a race one. The claim that all anti-immigration Americans are secretly--or blatantly--xenophobic loses potency when that claim requires declaring Cesar Chavez hated Mexicans to work.

5 comments:

Employee Monitoring Software- RemoteDesk said...

If you're looking for a tool to monitor your employees, I highly recommend trying RemoteDesk . This software allows you to monitor remote employees, supervise work schedule violations and keep recordings of the employees' screens.

Ana Dominguez said...

This was a really interesting read, Brandon! I had heard about Cesar Chavez's stance on illegal immigration in the past, but I was unaware of the extent of his actions. I had no idea that the UFW had actually patrolled the Rio Grande and captured undocumented immigrants. I once read that Chavez eventually began shifting his position on the matter and claimed he would support legalization of undocumented workers but only after mounting pressure from other Mexican-American groups. Could his shifting views on immigration be a reason why Republicans haven't used him as their immigration icon? Either way, I definitely think it would help them with their immigration stance if they pointed to Cesar Chavez and brought his position on immigration to light.

Melissa S. said...

Similarities between Cesar Chavez and modern conservative immigration rhetoric is not something I would have thought existed, but you make some well-researched comparisons and arguments! As you pointed out, today it is very difficult to separate xenophobia and racism from conservative arguments, even if there are legitimate economic principles that can support limited immigration policies. Cesar Chavez was also much better situated to understand what immigration policies mean for farmworkers, while many (but I’m sure not all) conservatives are holding immigration opinions without empathy for current Latinx agricultural workers.

Taylor D. said...

Brandon, this was a very interesting post! I had never read or heard about Mr. Chavez’s views toward the Bracero Program or his Illegals Campaign. This seems to clash with many of his greatest achievements, which you have listed in your post. I do agree that this seems to be due to his focus on and support of the United Farm Workers union. Thank you again for an interesting read!

Galen Yun said...

Cesar Chavez is a powerful symbol in the labor movement. Until conservatives are ready to embrace the labor movement, I doubt there would be a whole hearted endorsement of Cesar Chavez. They can't even get behind a $15/hr minimum wage, so I dobut they'd like to see more power in the hands of workers. It would be extremely cynical to use him as a figurehead to speak for Latinos on matters of immigration, but I can see how the conservatives might like to use these facts to tarnish his reputation within liberal circles.